<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>However, using it did rob the ship of power and leave them vulnerable.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Another old SF and fantasy concept.
Any superweapon has to be given an off-setting weakness, otherwise the hero can always whip it out and win every battle. OTOH, if the hero is going up against superior forces he'd better
have a superweapon or he's going to
lose every battle.
(Thus, Frodo can become invisible to mortal pursuers by donning the One Ring, but this makes him
more visible to the Ringwraiths and vulernable to the lure of the Ring itself.)
I think "Doc" Smith was used a similar idea back in the 40s. (And if you're doing SF, rather than magical fantasy, and your setting is a spaceship, what more logical way of doing this is there than having the weapon drain the ship's power and leave it vulnerable.)
I think the whole
Starblazers thing is pure JMS misdirection, asuming he was even aware of the show. Of course he
may have heard of it, but if he did he was using a similar (but hardly identical) situation in the initial setup of
Crusade to prepare the audience for one kind of show - then he'd kick the table over at the end of S1 and reveal the show he was
really doing. The cure would have been found in S2, although almost immediately revealed to be something other than what it first seemed.
To paraphrase JMS, the search for the cure was as much what
Crusade was "about" as Sinclair's missing 24 hours or the Minbari surrender were what
B5 was "about".
Don't forget, in S1 of
B5 we got barely a hint about the Shadows or the coming war, which would occupy almost the whole of the next two seasons.
Crusade was developing the same way, as revealed by the unproduced scripts. The plague business, and therefore the resemblance to
Starblazers, was a decidely minor part of the whole.
Regards,
Joe
------------------
Joseph DeMartino
Sigh Corps
Pat Tallman Division
joseph-demartino@att.net
[This message has been edited by Joseph DeMartino (edited December 19, 2001).]