Search results

Couple of interesting photos:

That would be my guess too. I haven't been much of a fan of ST since I discovered B5 over 12 years ago. But this new movie is re-igniting my interest in the franchise.

A load of new details (and photos) about the new Star Trek movie can now be found all over the internet. I found these details on darkhorizons.com: From what I can piece together, it sounds like the Romulans go back in time to kill Kirk's father (thereby preventing Kirk from being born)...

If your "informed" opinions are based on inaccuracies, then they are quite worthless.

There are those who believe that jms has let us down by turning his back on any future B5 TV/DVD productions now that he has made a name for himself in Hollywood. And there are those who believe that he is simply using his new-found leverage in Hollywood in order to encourage WB to back a B5...

Refresh my memory; Wasn't one of the major issues with TMoS the fact that WB insisted on recasting all the main characters with better-known names?

Why can't he do both? He has said all along that he would write and direct the first installment of TLT, then hand the reigns over the someone else for future installments. Therefore, his involvement in TLT would be significantly reduced.

To be honest, I too feel slightly cheated. The whole idea of TLT was to make a series of relatively inexpensive direct-to-DVD stories. And now that WB are talking about producing further installments jms is pulling the plug? This makes no sense to me. So, now jms is settling for nothing...

It won't be finished until that massive Telepath War-shaped hole gets filled.

To be honest, I think this statement applies to everything produced after In the Beginning. After ItB nothing he produced for the B5 universe lived up to the quality of the first 4 years of the original series. But that's just my opinion.

Sure. But (for the reasons given) I really feel like S5 betrays jms's quote:

That's exactly the problem I have with S5. For a final season, it sure does have a lot of beginnings.... Lyta getting to grips with her powers and the start of her travels with G'Kar, the promises that Lyta and Garibaldi give to each other, the aggressive "Remember Byron" telepath movement...

That's a hell of a career change! :D

A 'demon' in the religious sense is the only logical explanation for the entity based on the information provided in the story. Can anyone provide an alternative explanation as to why it needed a man of God to release it from Burke's body?

Of course, the demon could also be a time-travelling donkey from the year 25,000,124. But rather than speculate on the infitinite possibilities not mentioned during the story, I'd rather speculate on what was presented in the story.

What are you referring to here? TLT had no "manipulative aliens". If it did, I wouldn't have half the problems with it as I do. The problem is the lack of such a (possible) explanation within the first story.

According to the Amazon websites, the R1 release is 75mins and the R2 is 69mins. I wonder why the difference? Or is this just a typo?

So, those books are only canon until jms decides otherwise?

I have to agree with Dangerousapple on this one. I think the first story would have worked better without the lengthy first discussion between the priest and Lochley. The whole 'decline of religion/need a new incentive to believe' issue is covered sufficiently in the subsequent scenes with...

Ehhhh.....I think someone has forgotten to take their meds again.