Springer
Regular
Fair enough, I should have used a different word to feedback as I wasn't literally expecting Jason Davis to read this message board, nor is it really my place to give him feedback on a project I've not seen yet, plus I doubt he'd want some random person on the Internet telling him what to write. However, my concerns based on what little information I have still stand and I'm allowed to espouse them in a conversation on a message board. Four books is a lot of money, especially with shipping to the UK costing almost as much as the book itself, so yes I'm going to hold this project to a high standard. If I think the final product is good then I will get all four books if finances allow.Involved? Not in the least. I stated what I wanted to state - sort of the purpose of forms, as I recall. But you called it "feedback", a term that usually would include it being directed at somebody who might respond to your concerns.
I didn't say a word about what the book is like or what's in it - that's not my place. I simply responded to what you said.
But I would also say to him to write the book he wants to write, regardless, and I and other readers will either like it or not and buy the other 3 books or not.
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
	
								
							
							 
				 
 
		 
 
		 nose around past messages and found The One where he discusses the number of book/s and reasoning behind it. For reference it is " Briefing #237 — 26 August 2024 ".
nose around past messages and found The One where he discusses the number of book/s and reasoning behind it. For reference it is " Briefing #237 — 26 August 2024 ". 
 
		 . ...and I think there was a "negative review" of the B5 Encyclopedia on Amazon which apparently complained it wasn't easy to read since it was just a bunch of definitions and stuff (
. ...and I think there was a "negative review" of the B5 Encyclopedia on Amazon which apparently complained it wasn't easy to read since it was just a bunch of definitions and stuff ( 
 
		