• The new B5TV.COM is here. We've replaced our 16 year old software with flashy new XenForo install. Registration is open again. Password resets will work again. More info here.

No SAG Strike

As of 9:55 PM PDT July 3, 2001, Variety is reporting that the Screen Actor's Guild and the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists have reached an agreement on a new contract with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers.
The agreement came three days after the existing pact expired.

The new deal, like the one the Writers Guild of America negotiated early this year, runs for three years. So we won't have to worry about this nonsense again until the summer of 2004.
smile.gif


Regards,

Joe

------------------
Joseph DeMartino
Sigh Corps
Pat Tallman Division

joseph-demartino@att.net
 
Thanks for the info joe, i hadn't heard that yet. Good to know that we don't have to worry about this for awhile now.

------------------
 
I heard the agreement was reported as "tentative"... that can be interpreted in SO many different ways...
crazy.gif


------------------
-Londo's Hair
"Vir, intelligence has nothing to do with politics!"
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>I heard the agreement was reported as "tentative"... <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Such agreements are always describe as tentative. Since there are over 100,000 members of AFTRA and SAG, they obviously can't all be at the negotiating table. This applies to most union negotiations:

The negotiating is done by a committee from the unions and a similar committee from the networks and studios. (Sometimes the elected officers of the union are also members of the committeee either by appointment or ex officio, sometimes not.) Once the two committees have hammered out an agreement they think is acceptable, it has to be approved by others.

In the case of the American Motion and Picture and Television Producers that mean each individual studio and network must vote on the pact, presumably with a majority winning.

In the case of SAG and AFTRA the means each union's executive board must approve the pact and agree to submit it to the membership at large for a vote. The members themselves then vote and the majority decides the issue.

So in theory each side has at least one more chance to reject the new contract (the actors have two) and nothing is final until all the votes are tallied. (Which will take several weeks, since once the two boards sign off on the deal they have to print ballots, mail them to over 100,000 members and allow time for the members to vote and mail the ballots back.) The Writer's Guild deal was agreed upon in early May, but it wasn't officially ratified until mid-June, when the ballots were counted.

As a practical matter the SAG/AFTRA boards are almost certainly going to endorse the new contract and the membership is almost certainly going to vote for it. Nobody was pressing for a strike. They hadn't even made preparations for a strike-authorization vote from the members - another process that takes weeks to complete and which they would have started a long time before the contract if there had been strong pro-strike sentiment among the union members.

With the soft economy nobody wants to do any more damage to the entertainment industry and the Los Angeles economy than has already been done by the mere threat of simultaneous actor and writer walk-outs.

(Some of the smaller FX houses and other industry subcontractors will not survive the current slump. The studios rushed to complete films ahead of the strike deadline. Nobody wants to start shooting anything new until the SAG/AFTRA deal is ratified, so there is very little post-production work in the pipeline right now. There won't be again until several months after production ramps up. Some companies can't survive six months without income, and that's what they're facing.)

Regards,

Joe

------------------
Joseph DeMartino
Sigh Corps
Pat Tallman Division

joseph-demartino@att.net
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Joseph DeMartino:
Nobody wants to start shooting anything new until the SAG/AFTRA deal is ratified<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>You sure about that? Jms noted that his TWCBN project was being pushed ahead of schedule, and the resolution of the SAG negotiations seems like the probable reason. I'd be surprised if the was the only production where it happened.
 
TWCBN had a fixed premiere date, so the production start date was also pretty much carved in stone provided that actors didn't actually walk out. The air date has been moved up, which is why the scheduled production start date has also advanced. That happened before the SAG agreement was reached, if I'm not mistaken.

Also, TWCBN is a new series. The network can't air reruns of the show in its regular timeslot as placeholders and to keep the audience tuning in until production catches up and new episodes start to come in, which is an option with established shows.

Motion picture production, which tends to be a lot more flexible in terms of release date than television, and which requires a lot more pre-production time, is likely to remain on hold until the deal is actually ratified. Movie budgets are also a heck of a lot higher, so there is more money on the line should the actors - against all expectations - reject the new pact. Since the studios rushed so many films through production in the first half of the year, they can afford to take a wait and see attitude. They have plenty of "product" ready to go for the next several months.

Similarly most existing network television shows ordered additional episodes for the 1999/2000 season, or held a few finished shows back from airing, in order to have stuff ready to go whenever the Fall "season" starts. Again, they are under less pressure than new series to get right into production because they have "stockpiled" shows in the can.

Regards,

Joe

------------------
Joseph DeMartino
Sigh Corps
Pat Tallman Division

joseph-demartino@att.net
 

Latest posts

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top