<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>Also, a Crusade series running at the same time the Rangers series is running will not happen.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
And you base this statement on - what?
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>Only Trek had the clout to try running two series in the same fictional universe concurrently, and decided it didn't work.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Paramount didn't "decide" any such thing. All of the
Trek series had 7-year runs and were cancelled at that point because they would have been too expensive to renew. (The original contracts were for 7 years and everybody would have wanted a raise.) Paramount therefore "fiscally repackaged" the
Trek concept in a new series at intervals, letting them overlap to establish a continuity of viewership. They didn't do this with
Voyager and
Enterprise because
Voyager was proving so unpopular that they wanted to put some distance between it and the next show.
JMS used the opposite strategy with
B5. All of the original
B5 contracts were for
five years. This would have made it financially difficult for Warner Bros. to force a sixth season. Everyone in the cast would have been lining up for raises. They would have to deficit finance the show, since the cost per episode would exceed the network license fee, a situation that WB had avoided up until then. As JMS put it, "I designed the show to fiscally self-destruct at the end of five years."
As for "no one every doing this
except Trek: Norman Lear had as many as four sitcoms (all spun off from
All in the Family or one another) "in the same fictional universe" running concurrently. There are two
Law & Order series now in production, and a third set for next year.
Batman &
The Green Hornet did cross-over stories, as did a number of other shows produced by the same studios and airing on the same networks throughout the 1960s and '70s.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>Basically, I've come to the conclusion that the development of the Rangers series pretty much killed Crusade.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Again, based on what? JMS has
explicitly denied this in public posts, and Bonnie Hammer has always left the door open for
Crusade's return in her public comments.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>Another possibility is to show the major events of Crusade in the Rangers series from the point of view of the Rangers, who were working closely with the Excalibur in Crusade.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Not JMS's style. He is not going to tell one story in a show designed to tell another, still less extend the show beyond its project life. (See above re: "fiscally self-destruct")
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>However, no TV series ever manages to come up with more than 5 years of quality programming anyway.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Right. The explains how
awful Law & Order is
(I think it is in its 11th season), how
horrible M*A*S*H became after year five (in many ways it was just hitting its stride) and why
The Fugitive,
The Mary Tyler Moore Show and
The Bob Newheart Show were such dismal failures.
If anything I think JMS chose the time frame for
Rangers precisely so that
Crusade could sync up with it if it returned to the air at the earliest point it could - both shows would be set in 2267 in the second or third season of
Rangers (depending on whether the series starts in 2265 or 2266.)
It is hardly impossible for JMS to produce two series simultaneously see (see the examples of Dick Wolf and Norman Lear above.) It might be difficult to
launch two shows in the same year. But once he's past the first season of
Rangers (and "TWCBN") he won't be righting all the scripts and indications are that both shows will have "looser" arcs, meaning he won't have to micromanage as many details for each.
Once the two shows are past the "shake-down cruise" stage of season one, JMS could easily launch a third series, especially if the crew overlapped significantly between
Rangers and
Crusade (which is likely.) That would also reduce production costs, which I'm sure would appeal to both Warner Bros. and Sci-Fi.
Regards,
Joe
------------------
Joseph DeMartino
Sigh Corps
Pat Tallman Division
joseph-demartino@att.net
[This message has been edited by Joseph DeMartino (edited July 10, 2001).]